Low-code vs custom software for Indian firms: Power Apps, Zoho Creator and AppSheet prices in rupees, three-year costs against a custom build and lock-in risks.
- Published
- Updated
- Reading time
- 15 minutes
Drafted with AI tools; researched, edited and approved by Althameem Ali. Our editorial policy
On this page · 11 sections
- What are low-code, no-code and custom ("pro-code") development?
- What do Power Apps, Zoho Creator and AppSheet cost in India, and Bubble or Glide?
- How do three-year costs compare?
- What the licence lines leave out
- When is low-code the right call?
- When does custom software win?
- What about lock-in and getting your data out?
- Can you start on low-code and move to custom later?
- Frequently asked questions
- What to do next
- Changelog
Full disclosure: we build custom software, portals and internal tools for businesses in Kerala and the GCC, and we still tell plenty of teams to start on low-code. In our own work, custom means a system configured and extended on the Xale platform around your process (reported by our team), not code started from a blank repository. The prices below are the vendors' own list prices, read on 4 October 2026, so you can redo the maths for your own headcount.
This guide is for owners and operations heads in India and the Gulf choosing how to replace a spreadsheet or a paper process. It covers what each approach is, what the main platforms cost in rupees, a three-year comparison with every assumption shown, when each wins, and how to avoid getting stuck.
What are low-code, no-code and custom ("pro-code") development?#
All three produce working business software. They differ in who builds it, where it runs and what you own at the end.
The labels blur in practice. Bubble calls itself (opens in a new tab) a "no-code AI app builder" yet builds complex web and mobile apps; Zoho Creator is low-code but needs its scripting language for anything unusual. What matters is the last two columns: low-code and no-code apps run only on their platform, while custom software runs wherever you put it.
Low-code is mainstream, not a fringe. Forrester estimated that the combined low-code and digital process automation market reached $13.2 billion by the end of 2023 (opens in a new tab), forecast about $30 billion by 2028 (21% a year, or $50 billion if AI speeds adoption), and found that 87% of enterprise developers use low-code platforms for at least some of their work. That forecast dates from January 2024, so treat it as direction rather than a current count.
What do Power Apps, Zoho Creator and AppSheet cost in India, and Bubble or Glide?#
Prices as listed on each vendor's pricing page on 4 October 2026: Power Apps (India) (opens in a new tab), Zoho Creator (opens in a new tab) (the rupee prices the page serves to Indian visitors), AppSheet (opens in a new tab), Bubble (opens in a new tab) and Glide (opens in a new tab). Dollar prices are converted at ₹95.99, the FBIL reference rate for 1 October 2026 shown on the Reserve Bank of India's website (opens in a new tab). Check GST at checkout.
One detail changes the AppSheet line for many small firms: Google Workspace's Indian price list (opens in a new tab) marks AppSheet as included in every plan, with Starter at ₹270 per user a month before tax. If your team already pays for Workspace, the licence for simple AppSheet apps is already paid for.
How do three-year costs compare?#
Take an internal app of the size our custom software cost guide calls a CRM or portal: orders, approvals or job tracking for one business, with a few roles and some integrations. Licences over 36 months at the list prices above, before GST:
The custom line uses the cost guide's lean-team assumptions: a build of ₹4–16 lakh, then hosting of about ₹1.3 lakh a year and maintenance of two to five developer-days a month, ₹1.2–6 lakh a year. The low-code lines are licences only. Someone still has to build and maintain a low-code app, whether that is your own staff's time or a partner's fee, so add that to the left-hand side.
One more thing about the custom line: it prices a from-scratch build, the kind most builders sell. There is a third route, and it is ours: a system configured and extended on the Xale platform (opens in a new tab), where the roles, automations, reports and AI already exist, as xale.in describes them. You pay one fee for the build, as our pricing page lists it. Or, as a subscription, it runs on one of Xale's own plans: priced per workspace, with every feature included and no per-user licence, as Xale's pricing page (opens in a new tab) lists them. Enterprise custom deployment and enterprise pricing are available on request. Per-user prices multiply with headcount, as the low-code lines above show. A one fee doesn't, and a per-workspace plan doesn't add a charge for each seat inside the plan. We don't sell from-scratch builds: the roles, automations and reports such a build writes first are already on the platform.
What the table shows:
- At 20 users, low-code is cheaper. Every licence line sits below or at the very bottom of the custom range. Power Apps undercuts even the cheapest custom build up to about 19 users; Zoho Creator Professional does so up to about 26.
- At 50 users, price stops deciding. Zoho Creator Professional and Power Apps land inside the custom range, so fit, experience and ownership decide.
- At 100 users, per-seat pricing bites. Power Apps and Zoho Creator Professional both cost more than the top of the custom range.
- AppSheet inside Workspace changes the maths. For a team already on Google Workspace, simple apps carry no extra licence at all.
- Year four is where the paths split. Licences keep billing; a custom build drops to hosting and maintenance.
What the licence lines leave out#
The per-user price is the visible part of a low-code bill. Budget for the rest before you compare:
- Builder time. Someone designs the screens, sets up the data and writes the formulas. Anything unusual needs the platform's own scripting, such as Deluge on Zoho Creator or Power Fx on Power Apps, which is developer work by another name.
- Storage. Power Apps Premium includes 250 MB of Dataverse database per licence; beyond that, Microsoft lists ₹3,330 per GB a month. An app that stores photos, documents or years of transactions can outgrow the allowance.
- Usage caps. Zoho Creator limits cloud function calls to 50, 100 or 200 per user a day by plan, up to a daily ceiling of 5,000, 10,000 or 20,000. Glide bills usage in credits.
- People outside the company. Customer and partner logins are priced separately on Zoho Creator, as a portal add-on.
- Ownership inside the firm. Who may create apps, who approves changes and who fixes a broken formula when its author is on leave.
None of these rules low-code out. They just belong in the same spreadsheet as the custom quote.
When is low-code the right call?#
Low-code is the sensible default more often than software companies admit. It fits when:
- The team is small and the process is simple. Forms, approvals, checklists, inspections, stock counts and trackers used by fewer than about 20 people.
- You already pay for the ecosystem. AppSheet for Google Workspace teams, Power Apps for Microsoft 365 teams, Zoho Creator for firms already running Zoho. The data is already there, and so is the sign-in.
- You are still discovering the process. A low-code version in a few weeks shows what people actually use. That makes a later custom brief far sharper.
- The need is short-lived. An event, a season, a pilot in one branch.
- Someone inside will own it. Low-code apps decay when the person who built them leaves, so name an owner and a backup.
Picture a builder whose dozen site supervisors already use Google Workspace. A daily site checklist with photos, a snag list and a material request form could run on AppSheet within days, with no extra licence, and the office would see every site in one sheet. Nothing about that needs custom code. If the same builder later wants buyers to log in, follow their unit's progress and pay instalments online, the answer changes.
The same logic applies to packaged software: if Zoho or Odoo already does the job, use it. Our comparisons of Zoho CRM and a custom CRM and of custom ERP against Odoo or Zoho cover those cases.
When does custom software win?#
- Many people need a small slice. Per-seat pricing multiplies with headcount, as the table shows, while a custom build's running cost barely moves.
- The experience matters. A phone-first screen designed for one job, in Malayalam, English or Arabic, gets used. Low-code apps look and behave like their platform, which suits an office team and can feel awkward to field staff or customers.
- Integrations carry the business. WhatsApp Business API, Meta lead ads, payment links, telephony and accounting software, all writing to one record. Low-code platforms offer connectors, but within limits: Zoho Creator's plans allow 5, 15 or 30 data sources and 5, 10 or 20 custom connectors.
- Outsiders log in. Customers, dealers and agents need accounts too; on Zoho Creator, portal users are a separate add-on.
- You need it in your own name. On our route, your data and your configuration are yours, exportable any time, in a workspace in your company's name. If you must hold the source code as well, that is a from-scratch build under a contract that assigns it to you, which other builders sell and we don't.
Two builds of ours show what this looks like. ReelsBuddy, a Marketlube company, runs its leads and sales CRM, production board, accounts, HR and hiring, and reports in one installable, phone-first web app we built; every sold video becomes a card carrying its deadline and the payment still due, so production and collections never drift apart (ReelsBuddy case study). And for a multi-branch business in Kerala, we built a branch accounts dashboard that puts income, expenses, outstanding payments and upcoming dues for every branch in one view, built to be simple enough for non-accountants to use every day. Neither is exotic software. Both are shaped around one firm's way of working, which is the point.
What about lock-in and getting your data out?#
Low-code apps generally run only on their own platform, so read the exit terms before you build. Bubble's FAQ is unusually frank: "there's no traditional codebase to export", but Bubble "can provide a raw export of your application logic as a JSON file" if you migrate, and user data exports as CSV files or through its API (Bubble FAQ (opens in a new tab), read 4 October 2026). Zoho Creator's plan comparison lists data import and export. In practice, your data can leave; your app cannot. Moving means rebuilding the screens and the logic somewhere else.
Four habits keep you free to leave:
- Keep the master data portable. Customers, items and transactions should export cleanly, with IDs intact.
- Write the workflow down. Stages, rules and approvals documented outside the platform make a rebuild a copy, not an archaeology project.
- Test the export before you depend on the app. Export a month of real data and open it.
- Know what a custom build would own. With custom software, the code is yours only if the contract assigns it in writing, which is one of the clauses in our guide to choosing a software development company.
Can you start on low-code and move to custom later?#
Yes, and it is often the smartest path, provided you plan for it. Build the low-code version to prove the process, keep the data clean and exportable, and set the trigger for moving in advance: a user count where licences pass the custom range, a limit you keep hitting, or customers who need to log in. When you move, you rebuild rather than migrate the app, but you carry over the data and, more valuably, a requirements list tested by real use.
A phased path that works:
- First: build the low-code version for one team or branch, and watch which screens and fields people actually use.
- Next: roll it out more widely, and keep a list of every workaround, limit and complaint.
- At the trigger: brief a custom build from that list, migrate the exported data, and run both side by side for one cycle before switching off the old app.
A hybrid is also fine for good: keep a low-code app for a small office process and build custom only for the part customers or field staff touch.
Building custom is also getting cheaper. In McKinsey's 2026 survey of 1,719 people, nearly a third said their organisations had decided against buying software because they could build it with agentic coding tools (The Register's report, 25 August 2026 (opens in a new tab)). AI speeds up the writing of routine code; deciding the workflow, testing and owning the result still take most of the effort.
Frequently asked questions#
Is low-code cheaper than custom development?#
For small teams, usually yes. On list prices read in October 2026, 20 users on Zoho Creator Professional cost ₹8.64 lakh over three years against ₹11.5–37.9 lakh for a lean custom build and its running costs. At 100 users, Zoho Creator Professional (₹43.2 lakh) and Power Apps Premium (₹59.94 lakh) cost more than the top of that custom range.
Can low-code apps run on phones?#
Yes. Zoho Creator says every app built on it runs on the web and on iOS and Android devices, and Google describes AppSheet as a platform to build mobile and web applications (opens in a new tab) without coding. They look and behave like their platform, though, rather than like an app designed for one job.
Do you own an app built on a low-code platform?#
You own your data and your configuration, but the app runs only on the vendor's platform. Bubble, for example, offers no code export, only a JSON export of the application logic and CSV or API exports of the data.
What is the difference between low-code and no-code?#
No-code tools aim at business users and avoid code entirely. Low-code tools add formulas and scripting for more complex logic and are often used by developers. Both run on the vendor's platform, unlike custom software.
What to do next#
Count the people who will use the app, list the integrations it needs and decide whether anyone outside your company will log in. Then run your numbers through the table above. If low-code fits, start there and keep the data portable. If it's close, or the app is central to how you work, tell us what the software needs to do and we'll say honestly which route fits, low-code included.
Changelog#
- 2026-10-12: Said what "custom" means in our own work: a system configured and extended on the Xale platform (reported by our team), paid as one fee for the build or as a subscription on one of Xale's own plans, which are priced per workspace, with enterprise custom deployment and enterprise pricing on request. The cost table's custom line is now named for what it prices, a from-scratch build, which we don't sell. The ownership point no longer promises source code: on our route your data and your configuration are yours, exportable any time, in a workspace in your company's name. The line on why we don't sell from-scratch builds is reworded, with the same meaning. No vendor price and no figure in the tables changed. On 13 October the per-user subscription figure this update first carried was withdrawn: the subscription is now described as Xale's own per-workspace plans, as Xale's pricing page lists them, and no figure is printed for it.
Related services
Written by
Co-founder, Marketlube
Althameem Ali researched, edited and approved this post. Marketlube is a growth partner in Calicut building brands, websites, CRMs and campaigns for businesses across Kerala, India and the Gulf.
